|
 January 2010
President’s Message: EPA Endangerment Finding may Endanger Federal Legislation
 |
TCC President & CEO Hector L. Rivero |
On the eve of the Copenhagen climate change talks last month, the Obama administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its "endangerment finding,” which laid the groundwork for the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions across the entire economy, on the grounds that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare.
It’s been a high-stakes game of chicken that the White House has played with Congress over who will regulate greenhouse gases. From the start, the administration held the EPA action over Congress, warning that if Congress did not come up with cap-and-trade legislation, the EPA would act on its own.
The threat was blunt: A few days after EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson issued the finding, an anonymous administration official said, “if [Congress doesn't] pass this legislation, the EPA is going to have to regulate in a command-and-control way, which will probably generate even more uncertainty.”
For the record, the Texas Chemical Council strongly opposes the EPA action. We believe that greenhouse gases should not be regulated under the Clean Air Act – a law never intended to cover gases like carbon dioxide.
We understand that the EPA had been sitting on its endangerment finding for months, much to the aggravation of environmental activist groups that have been upping the pressure for action.
President Obama did not want to show up to the Copenhagen climate talks empty-handed. The EPA’s action provides Obama with something to point to that his administration has done to be proactive on climate change, however flawed that action may ultimately be determined.
Rather than being alarmed by the EPA’s action, many Democrats in Congress may feel relieved. Most voters are suspicious that cap-and-trade is just Washington code for painful new energy taxes. In the midst of a recession, the subject has become toxic in congressional districts, especially for Blue Dog Democrats and senators in swing states.
The agency's move could easily give Congress another excuse not to act. If the Obama administration now owns the political hot potato, why would anyone in Congress want it back?
Now that EPA has made the endangerment finding, we can expect litigation challenging the determination on a number of fronts. The EPA derives its authority to regulate pollutants from the Clean Air Act. To utilize that law to regulate greenhouse gases, the EPA has to provide scientific evidence that those gases are harmful to human health, amidst continuous scientific debate on climate change.
Then there are the proposed rules stemming from the finding. Not wanting to take on the political nightmare of regulating every American lawn mower, the EPA has produced a “tailoring rule” that it says allows it to focus solely on large greenhouse gas emitters like power plants, refineries and chemical manufacturers. Yet the Clean Air Act clearly was not designed to regulate greenhouses gases in the first place.
If finalized, this tailoring rule will likely invite lawsuits from environmental activist groups who want to force the EPA to regulate all emissions, regardless of size. The EPA will likely get sued from all directions, and regardless of the outcome of those suits, we can expect the legal challenges to impact regulations for years to come.
Some congressional Democrats welcome EPA’s action in that it gives the Democrat-led Congress some breathing room to avoid addressing the issue before the upcoming 2010 elections.
Recent opinion polls do not support the EPA action. Over the past two years, fewer Americans see global warming as a very serious problem – 35% say that now, down from 44% in April 2008. Over the same period, there has been a comparable decline of Americans who say global temperatures are rising as a result of human activity. Just 36% say that currently, down from 47% last year.*
The EPA should reconsider its endangerment finding until there is sound scientific evidence showing that greenhouse gases are a pollutant and until the U.S. Congress can establish an appropriate law to regulate greenhouse gases based on those scientific findings and in concert with all other substantial global sources. Anything short of this will punish American manufacturers, further impact the U.S. economy, and continue to force high-paying manufacturing jobs oversees without any measurable benefit to human health or the environment.
*Survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, October 2009. |
EPA Proposes Lower Federal Eight-Hour Ozone Standard
On January 7th, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson announced a proposal to lower the federal eight-hour ozone standard to between 60 and 70 parts per billion (ppb). This announcement comes only 18 months after EPA lowered the standard to 75 ppb in March 2008. With this new, stricter standard, more areas of the state such as Austin, San Antonio and Longview-Marshall could fall into nonattainment, and areas such as Houston and Dallas will have an even more difficult task reaching attainment. To view the full release, click on the following link: EPA News Release.
There will be a public hearing on the proposal in Houston on February 2, 2010. TCC will be actively engaged in both the hearing and submitting comments on this proposal. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (512) 646-6404 or mmcmullen@txchemcouncil.org. |
TCC Comments on EPA’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule
On October 27th, the EPA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register which tailors the major source applicability thresholds for GHG emissions under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V programs of the CAA and to set a PSD significance level for GHG emissions.
The rule focuses on large facilities emitting over 25,000 tons of GHG emissions a year. The rule proposes to amend the thresholds in the Clean Air Act that trigger the applicability of PSD and Title V permitting requirements.
-Under the Title V operating permits program, EPA is proposing a major source emissions applicability threshold of 25,000 tons per year (tpy) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) for existing industrial facilities. Facilities with GHG emissions below this threshold would not be required to obtain an operating permit.
-Under the PSD portion of New Source Review, EPA is proposing a:
-
Major stationary source threshold of 25,000 tpy CO2e. This threshold level would be used to determine if a new facility or a major modification at an existing facility would trigger PSD permitting requirements.
-
Significance level between 10,000 and 25,000 tpy CO2e. Existing major sources making modifications that result in an increase of emissions above the significance level would be required to obtain a PSD permit. EPA is requesting comment on a range of values in this proposal, with the intent of selecting a single value for the GHG significance level.
TCC developed comments for this rule through its Air Conservation Committee and Legal Advisory Group, and filed comments on December 28th. TCC also submitted comments to EPA on two related proposals. On November 24th, TCC submitted comments on the EPA proposal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from light duty vehicles. On December 7, TCC submitted comments to EPA regarding the agency’s interpretation of which pollutants are “subject to regulation” under the PSD program. |
ACIT South Texas Hosts Economic Outlook Luncheon
The ACIT South Texas region held a very successful Economic Outlook Luncheon on December 9th at Flint Hills Resources in Corpus Christi. Speakers included Tim McDaniel, Plant Manager with DuPont; Kevin Farrell, VP & General Manager with CITGO; Frank Brogan, Director of Engineering, Finance & Administration with the Port of Corpus Christi; and Roy DeBolt, Contracts Manager with Kiewit Offshore Services.
The event drew more than 220 attendees. Thanks to our sponsors and generous attendees, ACIT raised $2,255 in donations for the Food Bank of Corpus Christi that will buy over 36,000 pounds of food.
Sponsors included:
-
Associated Builders & Contractors / Texas Coastal Bend Chapter
-
beAed Corporation
-
Bonney Forge
-
Cherry Demolition
-
Contractors Safety Council of the Coastal Bend
-
Craft Training Center of the Coastal Bend
-
Evergreen Industrial Services
-
Flint Hills Resources
-
Habonim Valve
-
Hagemeyer NA
-
Industrial Scientific Corporation
-
KITZ Corporation
-
Lewis-Goetz and Company, Inc.
-
Mega Fortris USA
-
N2it Containers, LLC
-
Railworks Track Systems
-
Safway Services, Inc.
-
Sherwin Alumina Company
-
Snap-on Industrial
-
Westbrook Manufacturing
Photos of the event can be found here. And copies of the presentations can be found on the members-only section of the ACIT web site. Click here and log in. |
TCC Hosts National Emphasis Program (NEP) Training Seminar
The TCC Occupational Safety Committee hosted a national emphasis program (NEP) training seminar on December 3rd at the DuP ont Clubhouse in La Porte. More than 85 TCC and ACIT members attended the daylong seminar, which covered:
-
Review of OSHA Chemicals NEP Directive/ Timing
-
Chemical and Refinery NEPs - Similarities and Differences
-
Common Areas for Refinery NEP Citations
-
Panel Discussion - What are Companies doing to Prepare for the Chemicals NEP?
In July, the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced its chemical NEP that establishes policies and procedures for inspecting workplaces that are covered by OSHA's process safety management (PSM) standard.
The Chemical NEP, a one-year pilot program, outlines an approach for compliance officers who conduct site inspections. The program's inspection process includes asking detailed questions designed to gather facts related to PSM requirements and verifying that employers' written and implemented PSM programs are consistent. The intent of the NEP is to conduct quick inspections at a large number of facilities that will be randomly selected from a list of worksites likely to have highly hazardous chemicals in quantities covered by the standard.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mike McMullen at (512) 646-6404 or via email at mmcmullen@txchemcouncil.org. |
EPA Region 6 Releases Air Monitoring Data from Five Texas Schools
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 has announced the results of air toxics monitoring data from five Texas schools, which were recently posted on the agency’s Web site. The schools are IC Evans Elementary School, Burkburnett, Texas; Lamkin Elementary School, Cypress, Texas; NW Harllee Elementary School, Dallas, Texas; and San Jacinto Elementary/Deer Park Junior High School, Deer Park, Texas.
The Schools Air Toxics Monitoring Initiative, which is monitoring 63 schools in 22 states, is designed to help EPA and state environmental agencies understand whether long-term exposure to toxics in the outdoor air poses health concerns for children and staff at schools, as well as residents in the surrounding community. The data is posted at http://www.epa.gov/schoolair/schools.html EPA Region 6 is currently monitoring at eight schools in the region that were selected as part of the initiative. The results of air toxics monitoring data show that levels of hazardous air pollutants at the five Texas schools are well below levels of short-term concern. The first results showed that levels of hazardous air pollutants at Eden Gardens Fundamental Elementary School were also well below levels of short-term concern. EPA scientists warn against drawing conclusions at this point as the study is designed to determine whether long-term, exposure poses health concerns for children and staff. Once monitoring is complete, the full set of results from all of the schools will be analyzed to evaluate the potential for health concerns related to long-term exposure of hazardous air pollutants. EPA will post this analysis to the Web once it is complete. Outdoor air at each of the schools will be monitored for approximately 60 days, and air quality monitors will take a minimum of ten daily samples during the sampling period. EPA is extending monitoring at a number of schools across the country for a group of pollutants known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). A malfunction in monitoring equipment at those schools requires EPA and its state and local partners to take additional VOC samples to ensure that the monitors provide an accurate picture of VOC levels in the outdoor air. The schools affected in EPA Region 6 are NW Harllee Elementary School in Dallas and San Jacinto Elementary/Deer Park Junior High School in Deer Park.
Other schools being monitored in EPA Region 6 are Temple Elementary School, Diboll, Texas, and Young Scholars Academy, Houston, Texas. Air Toxics monitoring data for these two schools will be available at a later date. |
Without Copenhagen Cap, U.S. Cap & Trade May Be Out of Reach in 2010
U.S. lawmakers could face an uphill battle enacting a climate bill in 2010 that includes a cap-and-trade market in greenhouse gases, after last month's United Nations meeting in Copenhagen failed to hammer out a global pact on emissions cuts.
While lawmakers may still feel pressure to help the country lead in production of low-carbon energy sources such as wind, solar and nuclear power, the Copenhagen Accord did not include emissions targets. This will make it difficult for lawmakers to argue that the United States should have a cap while China, the world's top emitter of greenhouse gases, and other big polluters are not legally required to act on climate.
“We were previously of the view that cap and trade was becoming an increasingly hard sell in the U.S.,” said Paul McConnell, an energy markets analyst at Wood Mackenzie. “But I think the events in Copenhagen have probably made that even more difficult.”
Alternatives to cap and trade will emerge, such as mandates and incentives for increasing levels of energy from low-carbon sources like solar, wind and nuclear. Further delays in launching a trillion-dollar market in U.S. rights to emit greenhouse gases will disappoint potential investors and dealers looking toward a trading scheme that could be several times larger than the one in Europe.
The healthcare debate has delayed U.S. Senate action on climate, and financial industry reform legislation will likely push back the cap-and-trade debate into early next year, analysts said.
The longer the delay, and closer to the 2010 elections, the harder it will be to convince undecided Democratic senators to vote for a cap-and-trade plan.
“For a lot of moderate Democrats who are up for reelection, they don't want to be seen as closely attached to this because of the concerns about job losses and higher energy prices,” said Divya Reddy, an analyst at the Eurasia Group in Washington.
Said McConnell: “Cap and trade potentially could have economic impacts, which many senators would be loathe to push onto the U.S. economy right now,” as it struggles to recover from recession.
That could make it harder for the three senators working on a compromise climate bill – Democrat John Kerry, Republican Lindsey Graham and independent Joe Lieberman – to come up with the 60 votes required to pass the measure with cap and trade. Such a proposal was included in the climate bill that passed narrowly in the House of Representatives in June, 2009.
Plan B
 |
|
Sen. John Kerry | Kerry said in Copenhagen last week that the Senate bill may not contain cap and trade, and other options are being discussed.
So-called “Plan B” alternatives to cap and trade could include carbon taxes and national mandates for power generators to produce higher levels of cleaner energy sources, Reddy said.
A new climate strategy could also include elements of a “cap and dividend” plan, which aims to cut Wall Street's role in emissions markets by auctioning permits to polluters and delivering most of the proceeds to the general public.
But Kevin Book, an analyst at Clearview Energy Partners, LLC, said many senators and companies, like oil major ConocoPhillips and power generator Duke Energy Corp, are already sold on cap and trade. Some power companies that have invested in low-carbon electricity generation feel they could compete better against companies that burn mostly coal under a cap-and-trade regime.
In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency may become more aggressive on forcing polluters to cut emissions after issuing a finding in December that greenhouse gases endanger human health.
Still, the lack of a global agreement on emissions cuts will make it hard for U.S. lawmakers to convince the public to accept caps on emissions that get stricter over time.
“There's definitely scope for other solutions,” McConnell said. “For the U.S. to put itself under strict and binding emissions targets when other major emitters aren't doing the same thing, represents something of a challenge.” |
GOP Efforts to Block EPA Climate Rules Face High Hurdles
 |
|
Sen. Lisa Murkowski |
Republicans in both the Senate and House are working to block U.S. EPA climate rules, but critics of agency climate regulations will likely face a tough slog as they work to secure the support of both chambers and the president.
Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Texas Rep. Joe Barton are each spearheading efforts to circumvent normal committee procedures in order to effectively veto EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare. The determination, released earlier this month, opens the door for rules aimed at slashing emissions from a broad range of sources.
 |
|
Rep. Joe Barton |
The resolutions are the latest in a series of congressional efforts this year aimed at tying EPA’s hands as the agency works to finalize several major climate regulations due out by March.
Murkowski, ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Barton, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, say they hope to win support from fellow lawmakers who oppose EPA’s efforts, but even Murkowski acknowledged that she faces an “uphill battle” finalizing the measure.
Overall, “the odds of this becoming law are very slim,” said Daniel Weiss, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. “It would have to pass the Senate, the House, President Obama would likely veto it, and they'd have to override the veto with two-thirds majority of each house,” he said.
But while even proponents of the resolution acknowledge that it will be difficult to clear both Democrat-led chambers and the Obama administration, some expect that the threat of EPA regulations will spur many lawmakers to act to stave off EPA rules.
Andrew Wheeler, former Republican staff director for the Environment and Public Works Committee who now works for B&D Consulting, said there is a chance that Murkowski’s measure could clear the Senate.op
“I question whether or not enough of the senators fully understand what the EPA endangerment finding will mean,” Wheeler said. “I'm not positive that the momentum is there yet for all the members to fully understand what the endangerment finding means.” However, the resolution is less likely to clear the House, Wheeler said, where the Democratic majority is so large.
Senate Murkowski plans to introduce her resolution as soon as the Senate returns from the holiday recess, according to spokesman Robert Dillon.
In the Senate, the disapproval resolution would be referred to the Environment and Public Works Committee. If the committee does not favorably report the resolution within 20 calendar days, it can be discharged once 30 senators sign on. The resolution would then be placed on the Senate calendar, where it would be subject to expedited consideration on the floor and not subject to a filibuster.
Key Senate Democrats say they expect the effort to fail. “It's very difficult to use that procedure to undo any initiative from any regulatory agency,” said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Delaware).
Sen. John Kerry (D-Massachusetts), the leading author of the Senate energy and climate bill, last week said Murkowski “won't get the requisite votes” to clear the Senate.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), who plans to co-sponsor Murkowski's resolution, was more optimistic. “I think it'll pass the Senate,” Graham said. “I just think too many senators understand that the regulatory approach is the worst of all worlds. It adds a bunch of burdens without providing benefits,” he said.
Still, “I hope we'll do more than just disapprove of that action,” added Graham, one of the leading architects of a Senate energy and climate bill.
Sen. John Thune (R-South Dakota) also said he intends to co-sponsor Murkowski’s effort. He said some moderate Democrats may be willing to sign on to the measure but acknowledged that getting the measure through the Senate would only be the first step.
“To get the votes here is one thing,” Thune said. “To get the president to sign it and when he vetoes it to be able to override it – which takes 67 votes – that’s a pretty heavy lift, obviously.”
House Barton and his co-sponsors on the House side are also expected to face challenges finalizing the resolution.
The House cannot use the same expedited procedure as the Senate, but House lawmakers can use a discharge motion to bypass the committee of jurisdiction and bring the resolution to the floor.
Under House rules, co-sponsors need 218 signatures to send the discharge motion to the “discharge calendar.” Once it has been added to the calendar, the motion can be adopted with a simple majority and the House can immediately consider the disapproval resolution, which would come to the floor in the form introduced with no amendments and no written report.
House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio praised Barton and Republican co-sponsors Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, Darrell Issa of California, and Lamar Smith and Ralph Hall of Texas for their plans to introduce the measure.
“This EPA rule amounts to a backdoor national energy tax on every American who drives a car, flips on a light switch, or buys a product manufactured in the United States,” Boehner said in a statement last week.
Seamus Kraft, a spokesman for Issa, said it is too soon to know how the effort will fare in the House. “We do think that there is a broad feeling of distrust and resentment in the administration’s approach, which appears to undermine and usurp congressional responsibilities,” Kraft said. “We also have a strong sense that members of Congress who support cap and trade would back our resolution -- because it is just the wrong thing to do in these tough economic times.”
Ongoing effort If the congressional efforts fail, GOP lawmakers have vowed to look to other vehicles to limit EPA’s authority.
“The other scenario, of course, is we're going to continue to try to offer amendments to appropriations bills to prevent EPA from moving forward with the endangerment finding until Congress acts,” said Thune, who worked with Murkowski earlier this year on a failed appropriations rider to limit EPA regulatory authority.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) said he does not think Murkowski's resolution will become law, but added, “I don't think it makes too much difference.”
Inhofe said he expects that imminent lawsuits will “effectively kill the endangerment finding.” Legal challenges over the science upon which the finding is based and other lawsuits over pending EPA regulations will stop anything from happening, he said. “So I've never been concerned about the endangerment finding,” Inhofe added. “It's never going to happen.”
|
Obama Promotes Home Energy Efficiency Program
President Barack Obama said last month that home insulation “is sexy;” his newest appeal for Congress to pass incentives for homeowners who make their homes more energy efficient.
“Here’s what’s sexy about it. It saves money,” the president said at a Northern Virginia Home Depot store. He was joined at the outlet by members of Congress representing Virginia and labor and business leaders involved in services to lower use of natural resources consumed by homeowners.
Calling insulation the in-thing, Obama’s pitch was part of a broader administration push to lower the nation’s 10 percent unemployment rate. And it marked the fourth time in less than two weeks that the president has presided over high-profile events that call attention to efforts to curb joblessness.
The week before, Obama advanced a new spending plan that would provide tax breaks for energy-efficient retrofits in homes. The plan also calls for small business tax cuts and new spending on highway and bridge construction. The administration hasn’t put a price tag on the plan, but it could total more than $150 billion.
The administration is hoping to tap into money paid back by banks or not needed from last October's emergency $700 billion bailout program that pulled the country’s financial system back from the precipice of meltdown.
The White House hopes the appeal of the retrofitting program — which some administration officials have dubbed Cash for Caulkers — will be similar to the now-expired Cash for Clunkers program, which offered rebates for trading in used vehicles for more fuel-efficient ones. At a White House jobs forum earlier in the month, Obama told Home Depot chairman Frank Blake that home improvement companies would be key partners in this program.
Obama has also proposed expanding stimulus initiatives that promote energy efficiency and clean energy jobs. Currently, about $8 billion of the $787 billion stimulus package goes toward energy-saving investments in homes. The White House has said investments like installing insulation, sealing leaks and modernizing heating and air conditioning equipment will pay for themselves many times over.
In a memo for the president, Vice President Joe Biden said stimulus spending and other initiatives would lead to 1 million home energy-efficiency retrofits by 2012. The report also said the U.S. is on track to double renewable energy generation, including solar, wind and geothermal, in three years. |
U.S. Senate Committee Passes Bill to Help Captive Rail Customers
In mid-December, a U.S. Senate committee marked an important milestone in the long effort to obtain legislative improvements in the railroad regulatory program that could benefit captive rail customers, including many chemical manufacturers.
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, by a bipartisan, unanimous voice vote, ordered reported S.2889, the Surface Transportation Board (STB) Reauthorization Act of 2009. A copy of the bill is on the CURE web site: www.railcure.org The bill is the product of a ten-month negotiation among and between Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Committee Ranking Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), Surface Transportation Subcommittee Chairman Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Subcommitte Ranking Republican John Thune (R-SD) and Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND). During this process, the bipartisan committee staff reached out to the captive rail community, the railroads, the STB and perhaps others to develop this legislation.
|
|
Sen. Jay Rockefeller |
This legislation is a major victory for Chairman Rockefeller, who has championed the cause of captive rail customers since entering the Senate in 1985. Until becoming Chairman of the Committee this January, Senator Rockefeller had been frustrated at every turn in his effort to achieve legislative improvements for captive rail customers. When he became Chairman, Senator Rockefeller made the captive rail issue a high priority, established a process for reaching a bipartisan consensus and prodded the process forward doggedly. CURE member Robert Szabo of the D.C. law firm Van Ness Feldman said, “I saw real investment in this compromise legislation by a wide spectrum of Members and enthusiasm for achieving a compromise on a very difficult subject – in fact a subject that Chairman Rockefeller said was more resistant to compromise than the health care reform issue.” Szabo added, “I also saw bipartisan enthusiasm for seeing this legislation enacted into law this Congress; indeed a number of Senators on both sides of the aisle made this specific statement.” |
Recession Prompts Shift in Chemical Strategies
After a tough 2009, the chemical industry is looking for new ways to grow. In particular, companies are seeking to capitalize on long-term societal “megatrends,” including renewable energy and the need for improved food and water supplies.
Increasingly, companies are realigning their research and development (R&D) capabilities with these trends. DuPont allocated more than three quarters of last year’s $1.4 billion R&D budget to three megatrends: increasing food production, decreasing dependency on fossil fuels and protecting people, assets and the environment.
The global economic recession is marking a shift in companies’ long-term strategies, said Paul Hodges, chairman of consultancy International e-Chem. There is increased pressure on the world’s resources, and this is prompting firms to identify growth opportunities in areas such as energy, food and water, he said.
“Downturns of this scale are generally periods of transition,” Hodges said. As we emerge from the downturn, in three or four years, companies will be focusing more on low carbon technologies, he said. “Sustainability is going to be fantastically important. It hasn’t been important until now because we’ve always had a buffer stock of spare oil production. Today, supply and demand are closely balanced.”
Hodges points to two other periods of transition during his career in the chemical sector. The first, in the early ‘80s, was the move from national to global businesses. The second, in the early ‘90s, involved the increased focus on consumption-related products, resulting in the development of new products for the housing, automotive and electronics markets.
It is important “not to waste a good crisis,” DuPont CEO Ellen Kullman stated last year. DuPont has evolved through three transformations during its 207 years, emerging stronger after each economic downturn, she told delegates at the Wharton Leadership Conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in June. “We must be prepared for the world the way it was before the recession, but prepare to succeed in the different world that we'll encounter when the recovery eventually comes,” she added.
The chemical industry has been adept at developing products aimed at improving efficiencies and has the skills required to optimize supply chains and adapt to new feedstocks, said Hodges.
“It started off using coal as a feedstock, then moved to oil. A move to bio-based products should be no great surprise and should not cause great difficulties,” he explained. The current transition involves “doing more with less.” Increased food production, for example, will require an analysis of the supply chain, with the emphasis moving “away from obesity and towards a more responsible outlook.”
A study conducted by research group McKinsey, commissioned by the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA), shows the contribution that products developed by the chemical industry are making to cut carbon emissions. For every unit of carbon dioxide or equivalent greenhouse gas (CO2e) emitted in chemical industry production processes, the resulting products save two to three units of CO2e emissions, the study says. In other words, McKinsey calculates that in 2005, without the innovative products of the chemical industry, there would have been 8-11% more emissions of CO2e. Products that achieve these carbon savings include building insulation materials, lighting, marine coatings, automotive plastics and low-temperature detergents.
Cutting long-term global greenhouse gas emissions “will require greater use of innovative, energy-saving chemical products and technologies,” said the ICCA's president, Christian Jourquin.
Increasing urbanization is driving many of the megatrends, says Peter Cartwright, global executive director for environment, health and safety (EHS) at US-based silicon technology company Dow Corning. Quite soon, 50% of the global population is expected to be in big cities, he says. “Big towns are going to need secure energy supplies and clean water, and will have to deal with climate change, too.”
Dow Corning says much of its innovation efforts will be linked to trends involving green energy, clean and accessible water and a sustainable urban environment. “Our solar silicon is a key provider of low carbon and renewable energy,” said Cartwright.
Other firms designing their innovation pipelines around megatrends include Bayer, Dow Chemical and Evonik Industries.
German chemical and pharmaceutical major Bayer is focusing on health care, nutrition and climate protection, with an overall commitment to sustainability. “We are making specific contributions to balance commercial success with the protection of the environment and the needs of society,” states Chairman Werner Wenning.
The Dow Chemical Company has said that it is focusing its organic growth on four global megatrends: energy, transportation and infrastructure; health and nutrition; and consumerism. In transportation, for example, the company has introduced new plastics and bonding solutions to make cars tougher and lighter, increasing efficiency and safety.
German specialties producer Evonik is developing new business activities around megatrends including: energy efficiency; globalization and demographic change; and health and wellness.
Renewables The chemical industry has played a vital role in the development of renewable energy technologies, from photovoltaics for solar panels to composite materials for wind turbine blades.
About 80% of the energy consumed globally today relies on fossil fuels and non-renewable energy resources, says Peter Cartwright, Dow Corning's global executive director for environment, health and safety (EHS). “As those resources are depleted and climate change regulations come in, the market for renewable energy is enormous.” Solar energy, for example, accounts for just over 1% of today's energy consumption, he notes.
Global petrochemicals firm ExxonMobil estimates that wind, solar and biofuels will grow sharply through 2030, at an average of nearly 10% per year. However, they are starting from a small base which means their contribution by 2030 will remain relatively small, perhaps 2.5% of total energy, the U.S. energy group said in its “Outlook for energy: a view to 2030” report.
Concerns about climate change and future supplies of petrochemical raw materials are also helping to speed up the development of new bio-based materials. Global demand for bioplastics – defined as bio-based or biodegradable or both – is expected to rise fourfold, valued at $2.6 billion in 2013, according to market research company Freedonia.
Solar Energy Solar silicon producers are expanding their production capacities to meet rising demand for photovoltaic panels. Global polycrystalline silicon production is expected to reach 150,000-180,000 tonnes/year in 2012 compared with approximately 80,000 tonnes/year in 2009, according to Wacker Chemie.
The German specialty chemical producer plans to build a plant in Cleveland, Tennessee, and is expanding its German production. In Germany, the company has expanded its production capacity in Burghausen by 10,000 tonne/year plant to 25,000 tonnes/year and intends to build additional capacity in Nunchritz, said spokesman Christof Bachmair. The 10,000 tonne/year Nunchritz plant is scheduled to start up in 2011.
Dow Corning subsidiary Hemlock Semiconductor, the global leader in solar silicon production, also plans to build a plant in Tennessee. Located in Clarksville, the project is expected to require a $1.2 billion investment. Hemlock is also expanding its production capacity in Hemlock, Michigan, to approximately 36,000 tonnes/year.
Food The United Nations is predicting that agricultural output will need to double and food production will need to increase by 70% by 2050 to adequately feed the expected global population of 9 billion people.
Sustainable, increased productivity will need to occur as available arable land and resources shift, remain unchanged or, in some areas, decrease, says DuPont. The company has identified increasing food production as a key megatrend, and allocated about half of its $1.4 billion R&D budget to this area in 2009.
Innovations in biotechnology can help address the growing global demand for food and fiber and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, DuPont says. Biotechnology will play a critical role in doubling agricultural output by 2050, when the world’s population is expected to reach 9 billion people, executive vice president James Borel told delegates at the BioJapan World Business Forum in October.
Other areas of focus at DuPont include advancing the nutritional content derived from crops, supplying innovative packaging to preserve food quality and developing efficient quality-testing systems to ensure safe food supply.
DuPont's seed business, Pioneer Hi-Bred, has been working with small-scale farmers to help improve productivity, for example via the West African Seed Alliance (WASA). The Alliance is a partnership between organizations including aid agencies, seed companies, public and private sector plant breeders and governments.
“To sustainably increase small-scale farmer productivity, we must start with the context of the local agriculture practices, infrastructure, culture and government policies,” said DuPont vice president and Pioneer Hi-Bred chairman Dean Oestreich.
Local public-private collaborations can help to increase local agricultural productivity and, ultimately, global food security, said Oestreich, who retired at the end of last year. “By bringing additional focus to the food security and the potential of collaborative, integrated approaches, we can better feed the hungry and contribute to stability and security around the globe.”
Energy Efficiency Energy efficiency is critical in meeting growing energy needs, asserts Rich Kruger, president of ExxonMobil Production. The U.S. energy group estimates that energy demand will be about 35% higher in 2030 than in 2005 as economies grow and living standards improve worldwide. “We estimate that by 2030, the amount of energy saved through efficiency gains will be equivalent to approximately 145m barrels of oil a day, or about twice the amount of new energy from all sources,” Kruger says.
Products helping to cut energy consumption include Evonik’s flexible ceramic membrane technology, designed to make large-scale lithium-ion batteries safer and more efficient. Li-Tec, a joint venture between Evonik and Daimler, uses the technology to produce large-scale lithium-ion battery cells for automotive and industrial applications in Kamenz, Germany.
There is a wide range of high-tech insulation products for cutting energy losses from buildings. Germany-based Wacker Chemie supplies dispersible polymer powders to the construction sector for use in exterior insulation systems. The powders are added to mortars to protect the outside of the insulation systems from weathering and enable a solid bonding between the insulation system and the building walls.
Water The World Economic Forum has warned that many places in the world are on the verge of “water bankruptcy.”
About one in three people in the world are affected by water scarcity and the situation is expected to worsen, says Peter Cartwright, Dow Corning’s global executive director for environment, health and safety (EHS). “The population is growing. Unless something is done about this, in the next 20-25 years or so that one third could increase to a half.”
Dow Corning is developing products that can contribute to water conservation. In the textiles sector, the company has created a silicon-based softening technology that allows a reduction in the amount of water and energy used to process and soften denim. The technology can save about 4 gallons (15 liters) of water for every pair of jeans made, potentially saving 7.5 billion gals/year of water, based on 1.9 billion pairs of jeans sold worldwide, the company estimates.
Dow Corning is also marketing powdered shampoo, which requires a fraction of the water normally needed for shampooing, and has a rubber technology used in water irrigation that can cut water usage by 40%, Cartwright says.
|
Upcoming TCC & ACIT Events
January 14-16, 2010 – Houston Wellness Assn.’s 2010 Wellness Symposium at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston. Click here for details: www.HoustonWellness.org
February 17 – ACIT/ABC Joint Mid-Coast Luncheon at the River Place Center in Freeport.
February 25 – The ACIT Houston Ship Channel Spring Breakfast Meeting at Brady’s Landing in Houston.
March 10 – ACIT South Texas Political Forum Luncheon in Corpus Christi.
March 18 – ACIT Golden Triangle Crawfish Boil in Beaumont. 
All 2010 ACIT events are now listed on the website: Click here.
On March 2, registration will open at www.ehs-seminar.com for the EHS Seminar to be held June 7 – 10, 2010 at Moody Gardens.
|
|